53: Skin in the game

Save to Listen Later

Podcast: Everything Hertz
Episode: 53: Skin in the game
Pub date: 2017-11-17

Dan and James discuss whether you need to have “skin in the game” to critique research.

Here’s what else they cover in the episode:

  • Should scientists be required to communicate their science?
  • If your research is likely to be misinterpreted try and get out of in front of what’s going to be said
  • Will science communication just become another metric?
  • The distinction between “science communication” and “science media”
  • Who’s going to pay for all science communicators that we’ll need to communicate everyone’s science?
  • Dan and James mispronounce Dutch and German names and give a formal apology to the nation of The Netherlands
  • Outcome switching in clinical trials
  • Does having skin in the game guarantee expertise, or just wild biases?
  • James’ recent desk rejection from a Journal Editor
  • Dan’s method to invite manuscript reviewers as an Associate Editor

The science communication Twitter thread
ERC comics
The “skin in the game” tweet
That study in neuopsychopharmacology on a IL-6 receptor antibody to treat residual symptoms in schizophrenia

Support Everything Hertz

The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Dan Quintana, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.

Powered by: ListenNotes